AI vendors are lobbying for antitrust exemptions to collaborate on safety. They are asking the wrong question. UK regulated firms must stop accepting vendor opacity dressed as regulatory necessity.
Ema's $77M Series B proves AI agents can automate repetitive work at scale. That's not the same as saying they can replace professional judgment — and regulated firms that treat them as such will face FCA and SRA scrutiny.
Read more: AI agents won't save you from doing the work right
The UK's £100M AI procurement scheme will create real business for UK vendors. But regulated firms cannot afford to buy the same tools the public sector does, because the public sector does not yet know what it will actually demand from them.
Read more: UK's £100M AI bet won't work without governance first
Washington's stumbling approach to AI regulation is no excuse for UK firms to deploy untested AI agents without governance controls. The real lesson from the American mess is simpler: regulated firms must build their own guardrails now.
Read more: Regulatory chaos is not an excuse for reckless deployment
AIG's warning that AI data centres are exhausting insurer capacity misses the real problem: UK firms lack the frameworks to assess these risks properly. Fixing intake discipline matters more than buying smarter algorithms.
Read more: UK Insurers Face Hard Limits on AI Risk, Not Just Capacity
The FCA CEO just told the industry what it needed to hear: AI is outpacing rules because most vendors and firms have built the wrong way. Trovix disagrees with the approach entirely — and built a different solution.
The $2.1 billion flood into legal AI is solving the wrong problem. Cheap documents without proper governance, audit trails and regulatory accountability aren't cheap at all—they're a compliance liability dressed as innovation.
Read more: Two Billion Dollars, Zero Regulation: The Legal AI Trap
More Articles …
Page 1 of 78