87% of UK firms use agentic AI but only 25% have real governance. This is not a technology problem—it is a compliance choice. Regulated firms without visibility into their AI systems are heading toward regulatory failure.
AI Governance  Trovix ReachLegal · Financial Services · Insurance · Accountancy

The Red Hat survey is damning but not surprising: 87% of UK IT decision-makers have deployed agentic AI systems, yet only a quarter have strong governance in place. For regulated firms in legal services, insurance, financial advice and accountancy, this is not a minor operational gap. It is a compliance crisis waiting to happen. When the FCA enforces Consumer Duty PS22/9, when the SRA tightens its AI oversight requirements, when the ICO investigates data handling, or when PRA SS1/23 is tested in a crisis, firms with invisible data flows and ungoverned AI agents will not survive the conversation with regulators. Less than half of respondents even know where their data is being stored or processed. That is not acceptable.

This gap exists because the industry has been sold a false choice: deploy fast or be left behind. The result is that many UK firms have installed AI tools—Copilot, Claude, bespoke LLM integrations, point solutions from vendors like Harvey or Luminance—without building the governance infrastructure first. The tools work. They cut processing time. They reduce manual work. But they do it in the dark, without visibility, audit trails, or decision frameworks. The gap between deployment and governance will tighten rapidly. Regulators are no longer asking if you use AI. They are asking how you govern it. The question is not 'do we use agentic AI?' but 'can we prove we use it safely?'

Here is what Trovix believes: governance is not a feature you add to AI after deployment. It is the foundation you build before deployment. Systems like Trovix Audit exist precisely because this problem is systemic. Audit dashboards that show data lineage, model decisions, and compliance status in real time are not luxuries—they are mandatory infrastructure for any firm subject to FCA, SRA, FRC ISA UK, or Lloyd's Blueprint Two oversight. The mistake many firms make is treating AI governance as IT's problem. It is a business problem. The data visibility gap revealed in this survey is not a technical failure—it is a governance failure. Firms using isolated point solutions or generic enterprise AI tools often cannot see what is happening inside the system. By contrast, purpose-built governance-first platforms like Trovix are designed to sit alongside whatever AI tools you deploy and give you the visibility and control you need to comply.

If you are a mid-market legal practice, insurer, financial services firm or accountancy business, here is what you should do now. First, audit where agentic AI is already in use in your firm—you will probably find more than you expect. Second, map data flows: where is client data, case data, policyholder data, customer data being processed by AI? Third, establish a simple governance framework—define who approves AI use, how decisions are logged, and how you prove compliance to regulators. Fourth, deploy visibility tools that give you real-time oversight of AI activity. Trovix Watch can help identify where regulatory change requires governance adjustments. The firms that will thrive after 2027 are not those that deployed AI fastest. They are the ones that govern it best. The governance gap is not a lag. It is a choice. Choose differently.

Source: Computer Weekly

Related Trovix product:

Trovix Reach →Book a demo →